To establish a comprehensive United States Government policy to assist countries in sub-Saharan Africa to develop an appropriate mix of power solutions for more broadly distributed electricity access in order to support poverty alleviation and drive economic growth, and for other purposes.

Summary: Directs the President to establish a multiyear strategy to assist countries in sub-Saharan Africa develop an appropriate mix of power solutions to provide sufficient electricity access to people living in rural and urban areas in order to alleviate poverty and drive economic growth.

Expresses the sense of Congress that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) should: (1) prioritize where loan guarantees to African financial institutions would facilitate involvement in African power projects, and where partnerships and grants would increase access to electricity; and (2) consider providing grants to develop national, regional, and local energy and electricity policy plans, and expand electricity access to the poorest.

Urges: (1) the Secretary of the Treasury to use U.S. influence at each institution in the World Bank Group and the African Development Bank to encourage power sector and electrification investments in sub-Saharan Africa, (2) the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) to prioritize investment in the electricity sector of sub-Saharan Africa, and (3) the Trade and Development Agency to promote U.S. private sector participation in energy sector development projects in sub-Saharan Africa. More: beta.congress.gov.

I support this bill I oppose this bill see voting resultssaving...
7 opinions, 1 replies
Add your opinion:
Preview:
(mouse over or touch to update)
Add your opinion
100
opinion
5 votes
May 22, 2015

First, the United States is broke and should be more concerned about getting it's own house in order than spending money elsewhere.

Second, with Africom up and running, I suspect half the reason for this is to build a better infrastructure so we have something to bomb there. And I'm quite sure it will be a nice, fat government contract for some politically connected rich guy, who will stick the Africans with second rate wires and make off with a fortune.

Third, isn't about time we leave Africa ALONE? How many more Westerners are going to go striding in there with "solutions", only to make it worse? We wrecked their economies, armed them to the teeth and set off ethnic, religious and tribal tensions for decades. Enough! Let Africa settle it's own scores and when it finally gets a few stable governments that ask for aid, then maybe.

subscribe
::unhide-discussion::
0
main reply
0 votes,
May 22, 2015

Right on, you hit every nail on the head. Great post.

subscribe
100
1 vote
May 22, 2015

If Africa wants to be "powered up" then Africa most likely has the means to do it themselves.

If senators and congressmen want to spend American tax dollars (dollars I'm constantly assured that we DON'T have) then those same senators and congressmen probably need to go find other jobs that don't concern wasting American money on improving foreign countries.

subscribe
100
1 vote
Jun 18, 2015

I personally feel the main reason for this is to combat the Chinese and Indian trade in eastern and southern Africa. I went to Kenya a couple of years ago and all the locals were talking about was the fact the Chinese had been building them roads, selling them cheap equipment and vehicles, therefore modernizing the country from their perspective. In return the Kenyan government gave the chines the rights to some of their raw resources. Africa is a gold mine in the eye's of the advanced world, due to the instability of the countries they haven't been able to tap into their natural resources as much as they'd like to and due to that abundance it has grasped the attention of major powers. As to this bill, the USA may help build the African infrastructure but after doing that do you think that the USA would let Africa import more goods from China? I doubt it.

subscribe
50
2 votes
May 22, 2015

Always nice to see your hard earned tax dollars given to some foreign entity. We need to spend our money on our own issues before worrying about every third world country. We're no longer the country we used to be and it's time to wake up. This bill should be opposed.

subscribe
-1
1 vote
May 22, 2015

This could lead to good things happening in Africa. Taking care of one another might not seem all appealing to most but it is pur responsibility as humans to look out for each other. True our budget is already shot but good things could happen

subscribe
-1
1 vote
May 22, 2015

You have got to be joking. What kind if idiot would think of this. We build schools, put in wells, send food and when we give them a chance to manage the improvements They just let them rust. What good is this going to do for you constituents? Raise the money in your state if you like but do not attach this to any of the rest of us.

subscribe
0
0 votes
May 22, 2015

I don't oppose spending money to help Africans get access to electricity. Besides being a good thing to do, it will ultimately benefit the U.S. economy. But the billion will probably be aimed at large, centralized, bureaucracy-heavy projects that offer business opportunities for tycoons, rather than smaller-scale technology that can be deployed more effectively over a larger area and help more Africans be self-sufficient. The push will be more toward giving Africans a reason to congregate near large cities where they can be a cheap labor force, and making them become dependent on large utilities.

subscribe
Add your opinion
Challenge someone to answer this topic:
Invite an OpiWiki user:
OR
Invite your friend via email:
OR
Share it: