Edits history: How should a society primarily take care of its poor?
Before changes:
May 7, 2015 - 09:38:35 pm
Option name:
Through the government/state
Through the state
Title desc:
Societies have always had disadvantaged citizens who are disadvantaged for many different reasons (mental illness, poor education, depression, indolence etc). How should society best care for these people?
Relying on the government/state guarantees at least some level of aid for all members of society, but that aid can be spotty, politically charged and expensive.
Relying on private charity empowers people to aid others and is less expensive to the State, but often results in large coverage gaps.
Societies have always had disadvantaged citizens who are disadvantaged for many different reasons (mental illness, poor education, depression, indolence etc). How should society best care for these people?
Relying on the State guarantees at least some level of aid for all members of society, but that aid can be spotty, politically charged and expensive.
Relying on private charity empowers people to aid others and is less expensive to the State, but often results in large coverage gaps.
This change was automatically approved.
These are the current values.
Title:
How should a society primarily take care of its poor?
Category:
Politics
Option name:
Through the state
Option name:
Through private organizations and/or charities
Title desc:
Societies have always had disadvantaged citizens who are disadvantaged for many different reasons (mental illness, poor education, depression, indolence etc). How should society best care for these people?
Relying on the State guarantees at least some level of aid for all members of society, but that aid can be spotty, politically charged and expensive.
Relying on private charity empowers people to aid others and is less expensive to the State, but often results in large coverage gaps.
Max. options selected:
1
This record was automatically approved.