Should Hillary Clinton face tampering with evidence charges for erasing her servers after Trey Gowdy sought a subpoena to retrieve e-mails related to official Government business?

Well, at least that's a more concrete accusation than I can find within a short timespan. It just seems to me that the act of deleting e-mails in itself is more frowned upon than other practices, because it speaks to the imagination (of the voter) or something.

This number of deleted e-mails (30-32.000)^[1] for example is pretty staggering (almost intimidating), but I have no idea how many e-mails politicians exchange on a daily basis (probably the more, the better). Somewhere on this website a question is asked about inbox maintenance^[2] and the creator of this question describes the number of 100-1000 as "some" e-mails, when I thought 50 unread items was something to feel guilty about.

Deleting e-mails still seems like an ambiguous act (at worst) to me, and I find it typical that these accusations have to come up with the Presidential Elections in the near future - like some sort of leverage to win voters instead of actual attempts to weed out corruption (which has been hinted at but not actually been proven yet). I have always felt deeply annoyed about this kind of opportunistic finger-pointing and shaming and it makes it hard for me to take the opponent's integrity (in whatever situation) seriously.

I have deep respect for Hillary Clinton and I wish people would generally stop taking down people who actually deserve to be looked up at. Just writing this gives me the feeling that others see this as a green light to criticize/attack her even more. "So, she has a fan eh. Well, I'm not joining in the groupthink, so I'll just ignore all the past successes and focus on this one questionable thing which clearly indicates future disaster or at least some level of shadiness which is personally and principally beneath me." <- actual corruption

Even if it's true that she ordered everything to be erased, so much more negligence and selfishness can be found in the rest of the (political) world and I just hate it how people focus on her because she has been a notable presence (the staggering number of e-mails being evidence of this) for the last decade and like to see her try and fail to create some new political reality (and then complain afterwards). If you had a problem with her then, you should have opened yer yap.