Yes, absolutely. The tax benefits alone should be ample reason, but the fact that alcohol is linked as more of a gateway drug, and with more deaths and disastrous effects on individuals, families, and communities attributed to booze, it's infuriating that this isn't a long settled debate. Evidence also points to the enormous amount of money from alcohol lobbyist groups in DC that do not want that infringement on their recreational vice market share.
Challenge someone to answer this opinion:
Invite an OpiWiki user:
Invite your friend via email:
click for template
Click the @ to see full topic's discussion.
Be first to reply!
For new reply notification