No, the 'league' moniker is a tax loophole so that this business can avoid taxes. Perhaps if the teams had to pay taxes then players would make salaries that are more down to earth. Multimillion dollar contracts would not be given out regularly if the teams were not profitable, so why should we let them get away with not paying taxes ?
The National Football League takes in more than $9.5 billion per year and is exempt from Federal taxes - yet it stands as one of the greatest profit-generating commercial advertising ever created [source].
Yes No see voting resultssaving...
1 opinions, 1 replies
Add your opinion:
0 votes
Apr 13, 2015
reply
subscribe
share/challenge
flag
Discussion (1)
::unhide-discussion::
I have a problem with the extortion of if the city does not pay for a new stadium the team will leave. If they want that option then they are a for profit company.
reply
subscribe
share/challenge
flag
Add your opinion
Challenge someone to answer this topic:
Invite an OpiWiki user:
OR
Invite your friend via email:
@
click for template
OR
Share it:
Share this discussion via OpiWiki smartlink:
OR
Status:
Active
Views:
1,536
subscribe
For new opinion notification
Voting
(10 votes)
+0
-0
Interesting
At: debate, forum.
Talks: 2.