Cannabis, also known as marijuana, is a preparation of the Cannabis plant intended for use as a psychoactive drug and as medicine.

Yes No see voting resultssaving...
23 opinions, 14 replies
Add your opinion:
Preview:
(mouse over or touch to update)
Add your opinion
100
7 votes
Apr 8, 2015

Marijuana laws need to be reformed period.

The war on drug has been a fiasco, but also productive in few key ways that detriment modern society.

The war on drugs have created huge underground economies that spend money in weapons and destabilize Latin American and other nations throughout the world by creating militias that undermine the liberty and democracy of those areas.

It has created a huge financial siphon of cash to police departments and packed our courtrooms. This creates an over burdened judicial system that rob us all from our right to a fair trial. When someone caught with drugs is arrested for 20 years for their first offense instead of send to rehabilitation it means our fair judicial system isn't fair, but blind and intolerant.

Marijuana deserves to be studied for its medical property as well as to how it can psychologically affect the user. I am sure there are tons of benefits being over looked by making possession a felony and perpetuating the war into something so simple yet so far reaching as the marijuana plant is.

Let's not under play the reason the war on drugs began either, it was motivated by racism, narrow mindedness and a man who wanted to maintain the power he acquired during the war on alcohol which he lost after the 21st amendment.

All in all the war on drugs is a war against the people of not only the U.S. but the world. It puts money in the wrong hands and since we live in a world where the more money the better they push those drugs on our young to make lifetime customer of highly addictive drugs. Instead of punishing people with jail we should be helping them with treatment and awareness. Drugs can be bad but only if they are used in a haphazard manner just like alcohol. It is time for reform and drug education!

subscribe
75
12 votes
Apr 8, 2015

The War on Drugs is an utter failure. Marijuana has been in use for thousands of years and has not been contributed to a single death. Legalizing marijuana would save the U.S. billions of dollars (and considering how far we are in debt, we really should start turning this mess around!) Marijuana is not a gateway drug, it's not physically addicting, it doesn't kill brain cells. The propaganda surrounding marijuana is deceitful and just plain stupid. It's time to wake up and realize this natural, God-given plant will only benefit society instead of being detrimental as many may think. The stereotypes placed on marijuana users are lame as hell. Pretty much every ambitious celebrity smokes weed, and they've all become millionaires by being ambitious.

subscribe
67
9 votes
Apr 8, 2015

All drugs should not be illegal.

The prohibition of all drugs, medication and recreation, should be repealed.

Who am I, or you, to say what I or you can put in your body?

subscribe
::unhide-discussion::
100
main reply
1 vote,
Apr 8, 2015

As a recovering addict, I'll point out that many addictive drugs, though not marijuana to my knowledge, do directly harm the body and mind to the point where a person becomes unable to maintain their own life and well being through honest work in combination to their addiction. Regardless of their drug of choice, addicts will feed their addiction first, regardless of the harm it does to their well being and finances. Because of this, they will often resort to theft and other crime in order to keep feeding their addiction, and cease to operate as a rational human being.

That said, just throwing these addicts in prison is a horrible idea as well. It has no practical positive effect and exposes lesser criminals to more "hardened" ones. I'm familiar with an effective enforced rehabilitation program that included regular and random testing, therapy, and limited jail time (up to maybe a couple of weeks).

I agree that the war on drugs has been a complete failure, and I'm usually opposed to government getting involved where it doesn't need to be, but some drugs are a threat to non-users as much as users, and addiction is extremely difficult to break, even for a person who wants to break it, without some level of force being available to provide an appropriate positive punishment.

But Marijuana? Yeah, trying to prevent use by adults of right mind just simply isn't worth the damage done in enforcing the prohibition.

subscribe
::unhide-discussion::
0
0 votes,
Apr 8, 2015

People that become sick from an addiction need medical help.

Prison deters nobody. If they worked that way, we wouldn't need any.

subscribe
::unhide-discussion::
0
main reply
0 votes,
Jun 22, 2015

I smell a libertarian. but to be fair, I feel like people should be able to do what they want, but some drugs make people go nuts, and potentially harm other people, in that regard, it is not far. Marijuana makes (most people) want to sit on a couch and eat a bag of chips, a lot more harmless then heroin or meth but then again, alcohol is legal and it kills people everyday.

subscribe
100
3 votes
Apr 8, 2015

Along with any drug or narcotic it has its place of what is appropriate. Marijuana has it's place in modern society. Well off successful individuals manage to use the substance at a rate that is no problem to them or others. There is no position in society that allows cigarettes to be openly available to 18+ , but disallows marijuana to all. Law enforcement takes up too much of their time to fight these individuals taking it to extremes.

Marijuana needs to be changed to a lesser degree on the scheduled narcotics scale at least. It has shown to be non physically addictive and actually have medicinal purposes. The tide is turning on this subject and it will be beneficial to get a head of the storm. We are at a time in our lives where the benefits of marijuana outweigh the cons and the longer the wait the more harm becomes our country.

subscribe
100
2 votes
Apr 8, 2015

This is a moral/nanny state issue. I would understand if we were fully puritanical and alcohol was illegal, but having booze legal and pot illegal is inconsistent and makes it perfectly clear this is about money, not actual morality. Either let people do what they are going to do, with the abuse laws that are already in place, or "take care of us" and make booze illegal.

Pick one.

subscribe
100
User voted Yes.
2 votes
Apr 8, 2015

Absolutely!

All drugs should be legal with the individual responsible for using them correctly.

Nowhere in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights does it say the government has the "right" to nanny over it's citizens or what they do except where that behavior may interfere with someone else's pursuit of happiness.

All drugs, and quite a few other "banned" items, should NOT be controlled by a government that has absolutely no right to such control. Period.

subscribe
100
1 vote
Apr 8, 2015

Should this issue ever come to a general election vote. I would find a overwhelming vote of confidence for its legalization. Butfor right now the individual states are going to have to do the heavy lifting. I support the states that have dealt with the issue on a intelligent basis. Colo. Has more then helped its financial base for the state. Other states have also.

What the true impact if adopted nation wide. Is we would cut out Billions of Illegal dollars leaving this country, going to the Mexican cartels. You would never comprehend the amount of damage moving that US cash out of this country does. Lets just say it is very, very serious. And something the USSS needs to impart to the Congress.

I am probably one of the only few. Police Commanders that takes this stand. I do so for a myriad of reasons. From a Dept. Of Corrections issue. TO clogged court dockets. To Officers field time. The list is endless. We need to make the drug legal. And work within a structure of control. That way everyone wins. And not just the bad guy.

Just a thought.

subscribe
::unhide-discussion::
0
main reply
0 votes,
Apr 8, 2015

I am hearing rumors that even Southern States are looking at the medical marijuana.This from a group that would have said that Reefer Madness was true at least to get reelected. Now I think that group is seeing $$$$ signs and have decided it is OK. On the books treat it as alcohol is treated. When it comes to underage don't destroy their lives because they have a joint on them.

The main proof marijuana is no big deal is most college kids are exposed to it directly or know friends that used marijuana. Most of them became productive members of society.

subscribe
100
1 vote
Apr 8, 2015

Yes, absolutely. The tax benefits alone should be ample reason, but the fact that alcohol is linked as more of a gateway drug, and with more deaths and disastrous effects on individuals, families, and communities attributed to booze, it's infuriating that this isn't a long settled debate. Evidence also points to the enormous amount of money from alcohol lobbyist groups in DC that do not want that infringement on their recreational vice market share.

subscribe
100
1 vote
Apr 8, 2015

Even with marijuana there are legitimate public health concerns. All recreational drugs create risks of complications due to altered states of mind, and most also put strain on specific organs and glands. However, if we set aside deliberately enticing children into drug use as well as the administration of drugs to anyone through force or trickery, there are no situations related to recreational drugs that become better when people with badges and guns get involved. Preserving those narrow drug laws, truly more akin to preventing interpersonal abuse than banning substances, all other role for law enforcement and the criminal justice system should be terminated posthaste. Marijuana is the most urgent area simply because the numbers on prosecutions in some states remain huge, and the complications of legalization are comparatively small management challenges.

subscribe
100
1 vote
Apr 8, 2015

Many people were here for the end of the sixties. Times have changed and most the old timers like myself have lost interest in smoking or using. There is a place for pot , weed or whatever you call it nowadays. The choices are that if you choose to use it the people that hire and fire can choose to hire others that do not use it. That is OK, by me if they do not hire but it should be no crime either.

subscribe
100
opinion
1 vote
Jul 7, 2015

I don't think that it should. There seem to be more excuses than actual reasons to legalize it:

- "the war on drugs has failed" (<- so yeah, let's legalize it then(?))
- alcohol is legal (yes, when you're 21), and causes just as much/more damage than marijuana (<- so?)
- marijuana doesn't (permanently) "harm" you, but it does influence you (your mind, mood, judgement and REM cycle)
- "Marijuana deserves to be studied for its medical property as well as to how it can psychologically affect the user." <- it actually has been studied; just look it up (make sure the articles address pro- and counterarguments).
- "Who am I, or you, to say what I or you can put in your body?" <- like someone else posted, it is a matter of not only private but also public safety.
- Unlike alcohol, the effects of marijuana are more longterm. If alcoholism is a disease, then being a pothead is just as damaging (also to your wallet)
- as being used for medical purposes, I don't see the use of marijuana doing a better job than a health spa (more beneficial to the economy/employment as well); in Europe, they were a common solution for people with anxiety-issues before WW2 (even before WW1). I believe in Japan it's still a common place to go to for anyone.
- marijuana will probably be used for pain treatments and PTST, but while marijuana may inhibit (short-term) stress, there is a good chance individuals experience anxiety ("bad trip") anyway (and an altered REM cycle, as I mentioned earlier). Also I don't really see how marijuana is better at relieving pain than morfine injections. I don't know anyone who relieved their physical pain/clinically diagnosed stress with marijuana (succesfully); and I live in a country where its usage is legalized. It's not like no one here came up with the idea yet.
- it takes a lot of energy (in the form of greenhouses, lights and water) to grow marijuana plants; it costs (economically/environmentally) more than it yields, except when you charge more for it than the government can probably finance.

I think a lot of people (who aren't users) are curious and want to see the drug being legalized to see what happens next.

subscribe
75
4 votes
Apr 8, 2015

Frankly, I don't even feel this is debatable anymore. There is no evidence that legalization will do anything but decrease the prison population as we release decent people that were picked up for non-violent marijuana offenses.

subscribe
67
3 votes
Apr 8, 2015

I'm torn on this one. On one hand I'm not a fan of prohibition in any form from Government that is solely in the interest of protecting us from ourselves. The Government is not our parent and doesn't know better for us than we do, even if they do, who gave them that responsibility?

On the other hand, I worry about the negative side affects. Right now there is a lucrative black market for a fairly harmless substance (marijuana), legalizing as most others have said would pretty much kill the high profit margins as competition forced prices down. My worry is that criminals will always be criminals and will follow the money. Instead of selling weed to kids at a high school, maybe they will move to kidnapping and human trafficking of young women. I'd prefer we leave a few semi-harmless things on the outlaw side of the equation to occupy their efforts.

subscribe
::unhide-discussion::
100
main reply
2 votes,
Apr 8, 2015

I take two issues with this position.

First is this idea that the government is protecting us by keeping it illegal. It's fairly well documented that cannabis has a less harmful effect than alcohol. The government knows this. The DEA knows this. So you have to ask yourself, who are they really protecting?

1) Big pharma
2) The prison industrial complex
3) CIA "cartels"

It can also be debated that it's been kept illegal as an easy method of legally persecuting minorities. After a few decades of the war on drugs, there's quite a bit of hard evidence to suggest that the laws aren't equally enforced.

Secondly, is it really worth imprisoning people who haven't committed a violent crime for the sake of your hypothesis? It doesn't seem right to be willing to destroy the lives of hundreds of thousands of people, at the cost of millions to society, to prevent some of them from maybe doing something worse. Why don't we just make it illegal to yell? Because people who yell are angry, and angry people can be violent.

I just find that entire line of reasoning extremely flawed. The people who grow cannabis are all around us. They are our neighbors, co-workers, friends, and family.

subscribe
::unhide-discussion::
100
main reply
1 vote,
Apr 8, 2015

I guess this is a different take on marijuana as a gateway drug...now it's a gateway crime. Their is a huge difference between a criminal and a violent criminal.

subscribe
::unhide-discussion::
67
main reply
3 votes,
Apr 8, 2015

Now this is a twist on the slippery slope argument. You really think that some pot head selling extra dope to get himself some free bud is going to start raping and kidnapping when we legalize the stuff? Even if you are talk about some gun toting street thugs, if they are going to do these sorts of things then they are already doing it. There is nothing that will make me believe that because we legalize that people are going to start doing other things to get their rocks off.

subscribe
::unhide-discussion::
0
0 votes,
Apr 8, 2015

Talking more about Mexican drug cartels and mafiosa types and their ilk thank the average dealer in your hometown.

subscribe
::unhide-discussion::
50
main reply
2 votes,
Apr 8, 2015

I have never been a dealer, nor have I ever been a user, but I have had a lot of associations over the years with dealers and at varying levels of the drug trade and other things on the shady side of the law. I've also lost some friends to heroin. I can tell you for a fact that there is a major leap to be made from what these people I have known over the years are doing (dealing) to kidnapping and human trafficking. I can't stress that enough. Trading in people is several major steps above dealing even hard drugs like PCP and crack. I've seen a lot of mental gymnastics to get around a very wide birth of amoral gray area ground, but never enough in the overwhelming majority of these people to be able to justified something on that scope.

If you're ok with switching your criminal career to something akin to the human slave trade, then you've already most likely started making in roads to that choice with out worrying about legalization.

subscribe
50
2 votes
Apr 8, 2015

If marijuana were legalized then pharmaceutical companies, alcohol, tobacco, prisons, the police would all be hurting economically due to reduced profits due to competition and reduced crime. Clearly society favors these kinds of companies and policies because we like to profit from minorities and the less fortunate as much as possible.

If we have any hope of moving past our current level of cultural stagnation, marijuana will need to be legalized.

subscribe
::unhide-discussion::
100
main reply
2 votes,
Apr 8, 2015

Although I fall on the same side of the debate as you, I find this fallacious reasoning. I disagree with the notion that police are a profit seeking entity, and the judicial system is stepping all over itself these days to reduce overcrowding and reduce the EXPENSE of incarceration. It is an unfair picture to think of our judicial system as desirous of more inmates.

Pharma, alcohol, and tobacco companies would not be hurt at ALL by legalization. Do you realize these companies already have huge infrastructure and distribution chains in place to make MASSIVE profits of a new legalized vice like marijuana? They would quickly drive the people, your noble minorities and less fortunate people, out of the game where they currently make at least some money on the black market.

subscribe
::unhide-discussion::
100
1 vote,
Apr 8, 2015

I was only half serious here, that post was a dig at the main reasons marijuana was made and kept illegal over the course of the last 60 years or so.

As for companies being in a good spot to profit from something, that never stopped them from fighting to keep competition illegal before (as an example the RIAA and MPAA fighting Apple and Napster in regards to the commercialization of the MP3 file, or VHS back in it's day). Of course these companies stand to make a solid profit from doing something new but they are entrenched in old business models and do not like to have to adapt. This is why they spend billions on lawyers to keep competition locked up in court battles, this is why they buy out patents on competing technology and bury it. These companies will only move forward when the momentum is nearly irreversible.

The most profitable business model is a rent seeking model, you design and create something once and get loads of people to pay for it on a recurring basis and never upgrade, never innovate. This is contrary to how a free market should work, which is why we do not have a free market, we have a frigid and biased market that works to keep entrenched and out dated business models profitable and free of competition.

Marijuana is just the latest thing to start breaking away from that entrenched model, which is a sign that younger people are getting old enough to be in positions to make reasonable decisions.

subscribe
::unhide-discussion::
0
0 votes,
Apr 8, 2015

What would lead you to conclude that the police were NOT a profit-seeking entity? We've passed laws that allow the seizure of assets that are claimed (with an incredibly low burden of proof) to be the rewards of drug trafficking - and we've seen abuse of those laws in LA and TX, where motorists guilty of nothing but having a large quantity of cash on them have lost it. Not to the specific officers, but to the departments they work for.

The best way to avoid cuts to your department is to demonstrate both that you're doing a good job, and that there is an increasing need for your services. Failing to do so makes positions in the law enforcement sector harder to come by, and less benefits for those involved.

Plus, maintaining a lot of police officers is expensive: they don't normally actually produce anything, their only benefit is in preventing and recovering loss. You give them the means to generate some income for their city/county/state/country by zealously inflicting enforcement on people, and they'll do just that.

subscribe
::unhide-discussion::
100
1 vote,
Apr 8, 2015

The default concept of the police does not lend itself immediately to generating income in devious manners like you describe (seizing money for literally no reason and never giving it back when proven wrong). The problem here is the police as we know it are now primarily an income generating sector based on narcotics busts.

subscribe
50
opinion
2 votes
Apr 8, 2015

Marijuana is actualy more healthy, than ciggaretes. Ciggaretes only make your organism a trash. If marijuana is used once a month, it cleans your organism. Also makes your brain work /w 80% more capacity.

subscribe
-2
opinion
2 votes
Apr 8, 2015

It is not whether or not anyone has died from using marijuana that is the issue.
240 kids drown a year in swimming pools. That is real. But we do not outlaw swimming pools do we?
But it is a sign of moral sickness and decay of the moral fiber of Society that is the most troubling.

Smoking pot, for recreational purposes, on such a large scale is another indication that our Society is in decay.
Pot affects the hippocampus region of the brain, dopamine levels. On brain scans the damage is also similar to brain injuries.

The main point is why so many people feel that their life has such emptiness that they need to alter their perception of it by using drugs. Pot is a "gateway" drug, it desensitizes the user into experimenting in other drugs And as the dopamine levels from pot, over load the brains receptors, more and more dopamine is needed to " feel" high.

Since some think that pot is harmless, as far as cancer they are wrong.
But to me the more serious feature of the current legalization of pot is the " slacker" mentality that is spreading throughout our Society. People cannot name their Congressman, but know what pot is the best, and what is the best price.

Our schools have failed, the US places near the bottom in education in the World. While 3rd World Nations like Estonia, and Poland.
This is just another step in the long march of a dying and decaying Nation.
Drugs are used and encouraged, to pacify the Citizens, so they are unmotivated to change their political taskmasters. Who make themselves rich and powerful and the expense of the People.
We do not demand much of ourselves, so we demand even less of our "Leaders".

There are more cancer causing agents in Pot than in tobacco cigarettes.

Marijuana Smoke Contains Higher Levels Of Certain Toxins Than Tobacco Smoke
Date:
December 18, 2007
Source:
American Chemical Society
Summary:
Here's another reason to "keep off the grass." Researchers report that marijuana smoke contains significantly higher levels of several toxic compounds -- including ammonia and hydrogen cyanide -- than tobacco smoke and may therefore pose similar health risks. The scientists found that ammonia levels were 20 times higher in the marijuana smoke than in the tobacco smoke, while hydrogen cyanide, nitric oxide and certain aromatic amines occurred at levels 3-5 times higher in the marijuana smoke, they say.

From a NPR article;

The teenager's brain has a lot of developing to do: It must transform from the brain of a child into the brain of an adult. Some researchers worry how marijuana might affect that crucial process.

C. Nash smokes after possession of marijuana became legal in Washington state on Dec. 6, 2012.
Shots - Health News
Evidence On Marijuana's Health Effects Is Hazy At Best
"Actually, in childhood our brain is larger," says Krista Lisdahl, director of the brain imaging and neuropsychology lab at University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. "Then, during the teenage years, our brain is getting rid of those connections that weren't really used, and it prunes back.

"It actually makes the brain faster and more efficient."

The streamlining process ultimately helps the brain make judgments, think critically and remember what it has learned.

Lisdahl says it's a mistake for teenagers to use cannabis.

"It's the absolute worst time," she says, because the mind-altering drug can disrupt development. Think of the teen years, she says, as the "last golden opportunity to make the brain as healthy and smart as possible."

Lisdahl points to a growing number of studies that show regular marijuana use — once a week or more — actually changes the structure of the teenage brain, specifically in areas dealing with memory and problem solving.

That can affect cognition and academic performance, she says.

"And, indeed, we see, if we look at actual grades, that chronic marijuana-using teens do have, on average, one grade point lower than their matched peers that don't smoke pot," Lisdahl says.

In one study, researchers from Duke University analyzed data gathered over many years from people living in New Zealand. They compared IQs in childhood through age 38 among marijuana users and nonusers.

"We found that people who began using marijuana in their teenage years and then continued to use marijuana for many years lost about eight IQ points from childhood to adulthood," says study author Madeline Meier, now a professor at Arizona State University, "whereas those who never used marijuana did not lose any IQ points."

From the Daily Mail, UK
Why cannabis is a greater cancer risk than tobacco
by JENNY HOPE, Daily Mail
Smoking cannabis is more harmful than cigarettes and more likely to trigger cancer, according to a report.
Just three cannabis 'joints' a day can cause the same amount of damage to the lungs as an entire packet of 20 cigarettes.
The British Lung Foundation says that when cannabis and tobacco are smoked together, the harmful effects are significantly worse.
Its research suggests young cannabis smokers may also be at greater risk of throat and gullet cancers.
The foundation found that tar from cannabis joints contains 50 per cent more cancer-causing toxins than cigarettes made from tobacco alone.
Eight million Britons are thought to smoke cannabis, which some experts believe is a 'gateway' to harder drugs such as heroin and cocaine.
Earlier this year, researchers found that 79 per cent of children thought cannabis was safe while only 2 per cent recognised there are health risks from smoking the drug.
Dame Helena Shovelton, chief executive of the British Lung Foundation, said the harmful effects of cannabis had been swept under the carpet.
'People are under the illusion it is safe to smoke cannabis. Our report shows it is very dangerous to lung health, at least as dangerous as tobacco.
'It seems society is in the same position as when research first showed the harm caused by tobacco. It took 15 years for the Government to take notice but we don't want to repeat the mistakes of the past.'
Dame Helena said cannabis available today is 15 times stronger than the drug smoked in the 1960s. 'This means studies carried out at that time will probably have underestimated the effects of cannabis smoking,' she explained.
'Puff and inhalation volume with cannabis is up to four times higher than with tobacco - in other words you inhale deeper and hold your breath with the smoke for longer before exhaling.
'This results in more poisonous carbon monoxide and tar entering into the lungs,' Dame Helena said.
The foundation's report - A Smoking Gun? - analyses research from around the world.
It found cannabis smokers have a higher level of chronic and acute respiratory-conditions such as coughingwheezing and bronchitis. 'When cannabis is smoked together with tobacco then the effects are additive', it says.
Some studies suggest cannabis smoking may trigger chronic obstructive pulmonary disease which kills 32,000 people in Britain every year, the foundation's report adds.
'Research linking cannabis smoking to the development of respiratory cancer exists although there have also been conflicting findings.
'Not only does the tar in a cannabis cigarette contain many of the same carcinogens as tobacco smoke, but the concentrations of these are up to 50 per cent higher in the smoke of a cannabis cigarette,' it says.
Benzyprene, found in the tar of cannabis joints, can change the make-up of one of the genes which suppresses tumours and could therefore make cancer more likely for people who smoke joints.
There are also more than 75 case studies of young cannabis smokers with cancers of the throat and gullet - diseases usually rare in people under 60.

Read more: dailymail.co.uk/news/article-146853/Why-cannabis-great...ml#ixzz2ybUA7kuT
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

subscribe
::unhide-discussion::
100
main reply
1 vote,
Apr 8, 2015

Your facts are flawed . Marijuana should be an ADULT choice . Don't muddy the waters by the effects on a developing brain when drug companies pedal drug to kids .

subscribe
0
opinion
0 votes
Apr 8, 2015

It should not be legalized because the government would tax it crazy high... its best to just get it illegally.

subscribe
0
opinion
0 votes
Apr 8, 2015

Percentage is high because I guess mostly green lover attracting by question, apparently me as well.. :)

subscribe
0
opinion
0 votes
Apr 8, 2015

I think weed is the least dangerous drug. Never seen anybody start a fight or so when he was hight but when the same people are drunk they are breaking bones.

subscribe
0
opinion
0 votes
Apr 8, 2015

I don't see why not. Many believe that the reason marijuana is banned is because of economic reasons, not for the welfare and protection of citizens.

Even alcohol and tobacco are more harmful and have a greater capacity to cause dependency, but you don't see those being banned.

subscribe
0
opinion
0 votes
Apr 8, 2015

It can be used medically, and even recreationally it isn't that harmful.

subscribe
0
opinion
0 votes
Apr 8, 2015

Of course it should be legal if i can put tobacco and alcohol in my body why am i not aloud to put a safe alternative in my body. There are so many people that could benefit medically from cannabis its stupid not to have it legalized and studied world wide. I think the only reason its still illegal is because the government is making to much money with pharmaceuticals to put a safer cheaper alternative on the market.

subscribe
0
User voted Yes.
0 votes
Sep 10, 2015

yes then tax it. tax the production and selling of it. banning drugs doesn't seem to work.

subscribe
Add your opinion
Challenge someone to answer this topic:
Invite an OpiWiki user:
OR
Invite your friend via email:
OR
Share it: